Division Politics
With genuine curiosity I had to google why the Bloc Quebecois leader, Yves-Francois Blanchet was at the federate debate on September 10th. He has no intention or desire to be Prime Minister of Canada. I doubt Mr. Blanchet has any interest in unifying Canada and said as much in the debate. I found information on the Meech Lake Accord agreement and understand how and why the Bloc got official party status in 1991. It’s an insult to our democracy to have Mr. Blanchet at the federal debate as he represents one province.
We really don’t need more of what’s good for Quebec. We need more of what’s good for Canada. Am I
the only one? We must work together
across all regions to restore our democracy and unify the country. Candidates
at a federal debate should presumably be willing to represent all
Canadians. The last thing Canada needs
is self-serving federal leaders speaking on behalf of one province.
Why were people apologetic to Mr. Blanchet about his claims
he was unfairly treated at the debate?
All the leaders were asked tough questions and thrown into the
fire. Do I think the moderators left
their manners at home? Yes. Do I believe Mr. Blanchet was unfairly treated? No.
I find this whole ‘distinct society’ and unique specialness a little hard to
stomach. Mr. Blanchet is not what we
need him to be, and he should not be at the federal leadership debate.
There is a stronghold of division in society thanks to a
media ecosystem that traffics in outrage. It is our job as Canadians to try and
leave this country better for our children. Canadians are leery of any
political figure that tries to destroy unity and that is a good sign for Canada.
Comments
Post a Comment